Bargain over Joint Plans
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies the problem of multi-agent planning in the environment where agents may need to cooperate in order to achieve their individual goals but they do so only if the cooperation is beneficial to each of them. We assume that each agent has a reward function and a cost function that determines the agent’s utility over all possible plans. The agents negotiate to form a joint plan through a procedure of alternating offers of joint plans and side-payments. We propose an algorithm that generates an agreement for any given planning problem and show that this agreement maximizes the gross utility and minimizes the distance to the ideal utility point.
منابع مشابه
Promoting integrative bargaining: mental contrasting with implementation intentions
Purpose – The present experiment aimed to test the impact of a self-regulatory strategy of goal pursuit – called mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) – on an integrative bargaining task. Design/methodology/approach – Participants were randomly assigned to dyads and negotiated over the sale of a car. Before negotiating, participants were prompted to engage in MCII, or one or ...
متن کاملA Mechanism of Generating Joint Plans for Self-interested Agents, and by the Agents
Generating joint plans for multiple self-interested agents is one of the most challenging problems in AI, since complications arise when each agent brings into a multi-agent system its personal abilities and utilities. Some fully centralized approaches (which require agents to fully reveal their private information) have been proposed for the plan synthesis problem in the literature. However, i...
متن کاملPredicting Behavior in Unstructured Bargaining with a Probability Distribution
In experimental tests of human behavior in unstructured bargaining games, typically many joint utility outcomes are found to occur, not just one. This suggests we predict the outcome of such a game as a probability distribution. This is in contrast to what is conventionally done (e.g, in the Nash bargaining solution), which is predict a single outcome. We show how to translate Nash’s bargaining...
متن کاملThe Limited Influence of Unemployment on the Wage Bargain∗
When a job-seeker and an employer meet, find a prospective joint surplus, and bargain over the wage, conditions in the outside labor market, including especially unemployment, may have limited influence. The job-seeker’s only credible threat during bargaining is to hold out for a better deal, not to terminate bargaining and resume search at other employers. Similarly, the employer’s threat is t...
متن کاملInvestments and the holdup problem in a matching market
This paper studies investment incentives in the steady state of a dynamic bilateral matching market. Because of search frictions, both parties in a match are partially locked–in when they bargain over the joint surplus from their sunk investments. The associated holdup problem depends on market conditions and is more important for the long side of the market. In the case of investments in homog...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010